Vol XXXI No3 November 2022
17
shows the ‘tricorn’ shape to its upper section and following Patrice Plain’s research on identifying
such pieces (Ref 1), we can see that this piece has the same finial as the pawns and is therefore the
bishop.
There are also dated comments on the provenance of this set written in French, on the underside of
the lid of the box. (See Pic 3) The markings on the pieces date this set to 1765 and the makers name
is Jumelle who operated from a workshop in Saint Erme, approximately 120km to the northeast of
Paris. The Jumelle family were a well-known craftsman/business family from approx. 1620. The
handwritten inscriptions seem to relate to ownership and provenance of the chess set from the 1760's
through to the 1860's and include references to Francois Andre Philidor (1726 - 1795)'.
Picture 3: Showing the dated inscriptions on the underside of the lid
The positioning of the Bishop / Knight pieces are one more piece of evidence that supports the
‘Typo’ theory put forward by Tom Gallegos during his ‘enlightenment’ presentation. These
Phrygian set along with the Lyon style all have many similarities to the Regence style, so it is likely
that all these styles existed in France at the same time. One possibility is that some regions of France
or different makers wanted to add their own feature to distinguish their work or style, but it was the
Regence pattern that survived the revolution and lasted into the 19th & 20th centuries. This set is
one more piece of evidence, alongside the very early Directoire style set I reported on previously
(Ref 3), that the Regence and others styles, did not evolve after the French revolution.
References:
1) Les jeux d’échecs Français au 18ième siècle. Patrice Plain. 2011. CCI Congress
Switzerland.
2) https://ccifrance.com
3) The Encyclopedie Saga, Regence & Directoire Designs. Jim Joannou. The Chess Collector
Magazine VolXXXI No2. July 2022.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~